fbpx

Fikri Mülkiyet

Fikri Mülkiyet Gelişmeler: 275


Makaleler -
Fikri Mülkiyet | Markalar ve Tasarımlar || Mutlu Yildirim Köse


Makaleler -
Fikri Mülkiyet | ilaç, Tıbbi Cihaz ve Sağlık Hukuku || Selin Sinem Erciyas


Ülke Rehberleri -
Fikri Mülkiyet | Markalar ve Tasarımlar || Uğur Aktekin, Hande Hançar Çelik and Mutlu Yildirim Köse


Makaleler -
Fikri Mülkiyet | Markalar ve Tasarımlar || Güldeniz Doğan Alkan

  • Amendments to the Turkish Property Code were published in the Official Gazette on 8 July 2019
  • Notarised signature declarations/notarised signature circulars are no longer required for a number of procedures
  • It is hoped that this will eliminate paperwork and speed up processes at the Patent and Trademark Office
The Turkish Regulation on the Implementation of the Industrial Property Code, which is the main regulation for industrial property rights, has been amended by a regulation published in the Official Gazette on 8 July 2019 (No 30825). »



Fikri Mülkiyet | Markalar ve Tasarımlar || Zeynep Seda Alhas and Atahan Erkul

  • Red Bull opposed an application for a colour combination mark for goods in Class 32 based on earlier colour/device marks for identical goods
  • The examiner found, among other things, that there was no risk that the application would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctiveness or well-known status of Red Bull’s marks
  • The board disagreed, finding that the application was confusingly similar to Red Bull’s marks and might mislead consumers as to the source of the goods
The Re-examination and Evaluation Board of the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office (TURKPATENT) has found that an application for a colour mark was confusingly similar to Red Bull’s colour/device trademarks and, therefore, could not be registered for goods in Class 32. »


Ülke Rehberleri -
Fikri Mülkiyet | Markalar ve Tasarımlar || Uğur Aktekin, Özge Atılgan Karakulak and Mutlu Yildirim Köse


Makaleler -
Fikri Mülkiyet | Patent ve Faydalı Modeller || Selin Sinem Erciyas and Maral Sayan

It has become common for a plaintiff in an invalidation or determination of non-infringement action to demand a precautionary injunction against a defendant patentee to prevent it from enforcing its patent rights against the plaintiff, although there is no explicit legal provision for this in the Turkish Patent Law or procedural law.
»


Makaleler -
Fikri Mülkiyet | Patent ve Faydalı Modeller || Selin Sinem Erciyas, Aysel Korkmaz Yatkın and Aysu Eryaşar

Headnote
The Turkish Court of first instance held that the liability for damages arising from an unfair preliminary injunction (where no infringement was found in the action on the merits) is a type of strict liability and therefore did not investigate whether the defendant was at fault when ruling that the conditions for compensation were deemed to be fulfilled.
»


Makaleler -
Fikri Mülkiyet | Patent, Marka, Tasarım ve FM Tescilleri || Ayşen Kunt


Makaleler -
Fikri Mülkiyet | Patent ve Faydalı Modeller || GÜN + PARTNERS