Hardline Stance Results in More Seizures of Counterfeits in Transit

The Court of Appeals has been rejecting defendants' claims that their goods were merely in transit or that national laws do not apply to products seized in the free trade zone. Instead, the court now treats transit counterfeiters like any other counterfeiters.

The court first ruled against transit counterfeiters in 2004. In the most recent decision on this issue (Case 2005/5247 E, 2006/5336 K, May 8 2006), the court has supported its hardline approach by holding that since the defendant ordered and imported the counterfeit goods without seeking the proper licence, it should have known that its actions would constitute trademark infringement. According to the court, the fact that seized counterfeit goods are not subject to domestic trade does not alter the fact that infringement has occurred. Therefore, the court ordered that counterfeiters must be held liable without considering the nature of the trade and the confiscation of the seized products.

Although it is not yet possible to alert the entire Turkish customs system by filing a central application through the Ministry of Customs, the amendment of the Customs Regulation in 2002 means that owners of trademarks, patents, designs and copyrights are now entitled to protect their IP rights by filing applications with specific customs teams. By filing monthly renewals they can obtain year-long protection.

First published by WTR in Jul 22, 2007.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to stay up to date on the latest legal insights and events of your choice.