The Law does not include an explicit provision concerning the process for appealing Board decisions that impose administrative fines. However, it is accepted that criminal courts of peace are the authorised courts under Law No. 5326 on Misdemeanours dated 30/3/2005 since the title of Article 18 of the Law is “Misdemeanours,” and administrative fines are issued as per Article 18 of the Law. With this in mind, decisions imposing behavioural sanctions can be appealed before administrative courts. This controversial issue is subject to discussions in practice and among academicians.
Criminal courts of peace are first-instance courts in Turkey, and their decisions are subject to review by other criminal courts of peace, which are, again, first-instance courts. On the other hand, once the appeal process before the criminal courts of peace is completed, it is also possible to apply to the Turkish Constitutional Court.
Criminal proceedings before the criminal court of peace require close follow-up as the cases before the criminal court of peace are subject to simple legal proceedings, and the courts may resolve a decision quickly without a hearing. Therefore, in addition to having deep experience in data protection law, litigation experience with a criminal law background is of the essence. Thus, while representing our clients before the criminal court of peace for appeal of Board decisions imposing administrative fines, we created a team of lawyers with legal expertise in privacy law matters and litigation and included criminal lawyers on our team in these cases.
Administrative courts are more capable and experienced in reviewing administrative decisions when compared to criminal courts. We believe that the Board decisions, in general, must be considered administrative decisions and must be subject to uniform judicial review so that each stakeholder may benefit from the in-depth analysis that can be made during judicial review and arguments made therein.