In a case involving a registrant whose domain name was transferred to a complainant by a WIPO panel at the end of UDRPproceedings, the Turkish Court of Cassation has clarified that it is not possible to request “cancellation” of WIPO panel decisionsrendered pursuant to the UDRP.
Background
The plaintiff (registrant in the UDRP proceedings) registered the gTLD ‘donerstop.com’ on 6 June 2014. The defendant (complainantin the UDRP proceedings) applied to register the trademark…
»
The 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation (CoC) has ruled that there is a likelihood of confusion between the trademarks N11 and OTEL 11 (15 February 2024, 2023/3633 E (Merits), 2024/1117 K).
Background
The applicant filed a trademark application for OTEL 11 in Class 43.
The opponent, one of the largest online shopping websites in Türkiye, requested refusal of the application on the following basis:
OTEL 11 created a likelihood of confusion with its earlier…
»
On June 11, 2024, the Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency (“Agency”) announced on its official website that the “Guideline on the Packaging Information and Instructions for Use of Medicinal Products for Human Use”, “Guideline on the Readability of the Packaging Information and Instructions for Use of Medicinal Products for Human Use” and “Guideline on Excipients in the Packaging Information and Instructions for Use of Medicinal Products for Human Use” have all been…
»
The Regulation on Procedures and Principles Regarding the Cross-border Transfer of Personal Data (the “Regulation”) is published in the Official Gazette on 10 July 2024. Additionally, the Personal Data Protection Board (the “Board”) announced the standard contract texts, binding corporate rules application forms and supplementary guidelines about essential issues required to be covered by binding corporate rules.
Except for cross-border transfers that are irregular, occur on…
»
The 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation (“CoC”), in the context of a dispute arising out of a joint film production contract signed between the parties, agreed with the first instance court's finding that, in the absence of a clear determination in the contract as to when the film will be deemed to be completed, this moment should be determined as the time when the film registration certificate is obtained, and decided that the plaintiff was entitled to claim a…
»
The copyright law dispute, also known by the public as the case of famous actor Kemal Sunal, was concluded with the decision of the Court of Cassation General Assembly of Civil Chambers (“General Assembly”) after going through various stages for many years.[1]
In the lawsuit filed by the heirs of Kemal Sunal, the dispute centers on (i) whether it is possible to accept that Kemal Sunal’s economic rights as a performing artist within the scope of Article 80 of the Law No. 5846…
»
