fbpx

Insights

We share our knowledge and expertise to update our community and clients about legal developments in Türkiye.

Filters

The New Era in Administrative Sanctions of the Advertisement Board

In 2024, significant changes and developments occurred regarding the administrative sanctions of the Advertisement Board. The Law No. 7529 on Amendments to the Consumer Protection Law and Certain Other Laws, published in the Official Gazette No. 32707 dated 30 October 2024, introduced significant changes as of the date of publication, particularly concerning the administrative fines imposed by the Advertisement Board and the reconciliation against administrative fines. The… »

Long-awaited Secondary Legislation for Administrative Revocation of Trademarks Finally Published

The Patent and Trademark Office obtained the authority to revoke trademarks on 10 January 2024 Fourteen months later, the office published a regulation concerning the implementation of the administrative revocation of trademarks A key novelty is that, in addition to the application fee, the requesting party must also pay an escrow fee  Background The administrative revocation of trademarks was introduced with the entry into force of the Industrial Property Code No 6769 on… »

Turkish Regulation on the Implementation of the Administrative Revocation of Trade Marks Is Finally Published

With the entry into force of the Industrial Property Code no. 6769 (“IP Code”) on 10 January 2017, the administrative revocation of trade marks has been introduced into Turkish Trade Mark Law and revocation proceedings are entrusted to the Turkish Patent and Trade Mark Office (“the Office”) instead of Turkish Courts. However, the implementation of administrative revocation was postponed for 7 years, and during this transition period, revocation requests continued to be filed… »

Artificial Intelligence and Trademark Law

Articles -

One of the areas where the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have been intensively discussed is trademark law; while the changes brought about by this technology make attempt to provide innovative and effective processes in terms of registration processes and determination of infringement, it also makes it necessary to re-evaluate the basic concepts of trademark law. This year, as in previous years, the use of AI technologies by the authorities in relation… »

Insights from ICANN 81 and Domain Name Disputes in Türkiye

Articles -

The 81st ICANN meeting (ICANN 81) was held in Istanbul, Türkiye, in November 2024, offering a significant platform for global discussions on internet governance, domain names, and online policy. The ICANN 81 meeting underscored the importance of evolving global internet governance, particularly through advancements in the New gTLD Program and initiatives like the Registration Data Request Service (RDRS). While these developments highlight strides toward inclusivity and… »

Trademark Protection for Work Titles: Challenges and Insights

Articles -

Article 83 of Law No. 5846 on Intellectual and Artistic Works stipulates that the names of works can be protected independently of the works themselves under the provisions on unfair competition. Our assessment of this protection is discussed in our article, 'Protection of Work Titles'1. An important aspect of work title protection is their registration as trademarks. In practice, it is common for elements of cinematographic works, such as characters and locations, as well as… »

Court of Cassation Renders Controversial Decision on Likelihood of Confusion in Dispute Over Pharma Marks

Articles -

Background A Turkish company operating in the pharmaceutical sector, which owns the registered trademarks BATIKAR and BATISOL in Class 5, filed an infringement action against a pharmaceutical company selling antiseptic disinfectants under the trademark MIRADERM BATIMER. The plaintiff argued that the expression ‘batimer’ was similar to their BATIKAR and BATISOL trademarks, particularly due to the shared ‘bati’ element, and that there was a likelihood of confusion. Decisions In… »

The Concept of Loss of Rights due to Acquiescence in Trademark Infringement Actions

Articles -

The acts deemed as infringement of a trademark are listed under Article 29 of the Industrial Property Code No. 6769 (“IP Code”), and the claims that the right holders whose trademark rights have been infringed may request from the courts and that they may assert against the infringing party are detailed in Article 149 of the same Code. Although it is possible for the right holder to assert the claims outlined in the Code against the infringing party as long as the… »

Turkish Patent and Trademark Office’s 2024 Revisions:Updates to the Trademark Classification System

Articles -

At the end of 2024, Turkish Patent and Trademark Office (“the Office”) made a significant move by publishing a revised communiqué on the classification of goods and services for trademark registration applications. The changes, which came into effect following their publication in the Official Gazette on 20 December 2024, align the Turkish classification system with the latest updates made to the Nice Classification. These revisions aim to make the trademark application… »

Update on the Well-known Trademark Registry Debate in Türkiye

Articles -

The well-known trademark registry of the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office (“the Office”) became a discussion topic after the Turkish Court of Cassation decided in 2020 that the Office has no authority to create and maintain a registry for well-known trademarks (see (Turkey well-known trademark registry is again open for debate) First-instance intellectual property courts and regional courts of appeals adopted this decision immediately and changed their practice, while the… »

Never Ending Delay for Administrative Revocation of Trademarks

In accordance with Article 26 of the Industrial Property Law (“IP Code”) no. 6769, interested persons may request the Office to revoke a trademark pursuant to paragraph 2 of Article 26 and the decision for revocation of a trademark can be taken accordingly. For a long time, the authority to revoke the trademarks belonged to the IP Courts as regulated by the former Decree Law no. 556 on the Protection of Trademarks. However, with the entry into force of the IP Code on January… »

How Automotive Associations and Law Firms Can Combat Counterfeit Auto Parts Together

Articles -

Auto Spare Parts and Distribution Ecosystem The automotive industry relies on highly technical products that do not reach end users directly. Instead, these products are distributed through dealers, service centres, mechanics, and authorised resellers, who play a critical role in ensuring that genuine products reach the end user. For instance, essential annual maintenance activities such as spare part replacement, oil refilling, and system updates are carried out by these… »

Stay Informed

Subscribe to stay up to date on the latest legal insights and events of your choice.